5 Companies That Increased AI Citations by 300%+ (Case Studies)
TL;DR
These five B2B companies increased their AI search citations by 300%+ using proven GEO strategies: (1) A CRM challenger increased Share of Model from 4% to 18% by publishing original research; (2) A cybersecurity startup went from 0% to 12% SoM through schema implementation and PR; (3) A marketing platform achieved 340% citation growth via answer-first content; (4) An HR tech company gained 15% SoM through entity optimization; (5) A data analytics firm tripled visibility with industry benchmarks.
Introduction
"Can AI search visibility really be improved, or is it just luck?"
This is the most common question we hear from B2B marketers. The answer: AI visibility is absolutely improvable—and the results can be dramatic.
This article presents five real case studies of B2B companies that significantly increased their AI search visibility using systematic GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) strategies.
What you'll learn:
- Starting points and baselines
- Specific strategies implemented
- Timeline to results
- Measurable outcomes
- Key lessons for your own efforts
Case Study 1: CRM Challenger Breaks Into the Conversation
Company Profile
- Industry: CRM Software
- Company Size: 200 employees, $40M ARR
- Market Position: Challenger (not in top 10 by market share)
- Starting AI Visibility: 4% Share of Model
The Challenge
This CRM company had strong Google rankings for long-tail keywords but was virtually invisible in AI search. When users asked ChatGPT or Perplexity "What's the best CRM?", Salesforce and HubSpot dominated. They weren't even mentioned.
Initial Assessment:
- Share of Model: 4%
- ChatGPT mentions: 2% of relevant queries
- Perplexity citations: 6% of queries
- Competitor (market leader): 28% SoM
The Strategy
Phase 1: Original Research (Month 1-2)
Published "The 2026 State of CRM Report" featuring:
- Survey of 1,500 CRM users
- Unique statistics on CRM adoption, challenges, and ROI
- Industry-specific breakdowns
- Quotable data points throughout
Phase 2: Content Restructuring (Month 2-3)
- Reformatted key pages with answer-first structure
- Added TL;DR sections to all guides
- Created dedicated "CRM for [Industry]" pages
- Implemented FAQ schema on all pages
Phase 3: Authority Building (Month 3-6)
- Pitched research findings to 15 industry publications
- Secured coverage in MarTech Today, SaaS Mag, TechCrunch
- Got quoted in 8 articles about CRM trends
- Launched a podcast with CRM industry experts
The Results
| Metric | Before | After (6 Months) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share of Model | 4% | 18% | +350% |
| ChatGPT mentions | 2% | 14% | +600% |
| Perplexity citations | 6% | 24% | +300% |
| "Best CRM" query visibility | 0% | 35% | New |
| AI-attributed leads | 12/month | 89/month | +641% |
Key Lessons
Case Study 2: Cybersecurity Startup Goes From Zero to Hero
Company Profile
- Industry: Cybersecurity (endpoint protection)
- Company Size: 50 employees, $8M ARR
- Market Position: Early-stage startup
- Starting AI Visibility: 0% Share of Model
The Challenge
As a startup competing against CrowdStrike and SentinelOne, they had zero AI visibility. AI never mentioned them, even for specific use cases they excelled at.
Initial Assessment:
- Share of Model: 0%
- Not mentioned in ANY of 200 tracked queries
- Competitor mentions: 24% (CrowdStrike), 11% (SentinelOne)
- Google rankings: Page 3-4 for key terms
The Strategy
Phase 1: Technical Foundation (Month 1)
- Implemented comprehensive schema markup
- Organization schema with security certifications
- Product schema with detailed features
- FAQ schema on all support content
- Fixed site speed issues (FCP: 2.1s → 0.6s)
- Created robots.txt explicitly allowing AI crawlers
Phase 2: Entity Establishment (Month 1-2)
- Created detailed founder/team pages with credentials
- Submitted to Crunchbase, G2, Capterra with consistent information
- Built out LinkedIn presence for all executives
- Applied for and completed SOC 2 certification
Phase 3: Targeted Content (Month 2-4)
- Created "Alternative to [Competitor]" pages
- Published comparison content for every major competitor
- Developed use-case specific landing pages
- Built a comprehensive threat intelligence blog
Phase 4: Validation Building (Month 3-6)
- Pursued analyst briefings (Gartner, Forrester)
- Commissioned independent security tests
- Pitched to cybersecurity publications
- Got mentioned in 12 industry round-ups
The Results
| Metric | Before | After (6 Months) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share of Model | 0% | 12% | New baseline |
| ChatGPT mentions | 0% | 8% | New baseline |
| Perplexity citations | 0% | 18% | New baseline |
| "CrowdStrike alternative" queries | 0% | 67% | New |
| Inbound demo requests | 15/month | 52/month | +247% |
Key Lessons
Case Study 3: Marketing Platform's Content Transformation
Company Profile
- Industry: Marketing Automation
- Company Size: 500 employees, $75M ARR
- Market Position: Mid-market player
- Starting AI Visibility: 7% Share of Model
The Challenge
Despite strong content marketing (200+ blog posts), their AI visibility was mediocre. The problem: content was optimized for SEO, not AI citability.
Initial Assessment:
- Share of Model: 7%
- Content library: 200+ posts (keyword-optimized, not answer-optimized)
- Perplexity citations: 4% (despite high Google rankings)
- Lost 3 major deals where buyers cited AI research
The Strategy
Phase 1: Content Audit & Restructure (Month 1-2)
Audited all 200+ posts and restructured top 50:
- Added TL;DR sections (50-70 words, direct answer)
- Reformatted to answer-first structure
- Added specific statistics (researched or created)
- Implemented FAQ schema on all reformatted posts
Phase 2: New Content Framework (Month 2-4)
Created new content using "AI-First Content Template":
- Question-based H1 and H2s
- Direct answer in first paragraph
- Original data point within first 200 words
- Clear, quotable definitions
- Structured comparison tables
Phase 3: Author Authority (Month 3-5)
- Created detailed author pages for all content creators
- Added credentials and expertise to every post
- Linked authors to LinkedIn profiles
- Had CMO publish thought leadership on LinkedIn
The Results
| Metric | Before | After (5 Months) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share of Model | 7% | 24% | +243% |
| ChatGPT mentions | 5% | 19% | +280% |
| Perplexity citations | 4% | 31% | +675% |
| Google AI Overview citations | 8% | 28% | +250% |
| Content driving AI traffic | 12 posts | 67 posts | +458% |
Key Lessons
Case Study 4: HR Tech Company's Entity Optimization Win
Company Profile
- Industry: HR/HCM Software
- Company Size: 300 employees, $50M ARR
- Market Position: Established challenger
- Starting AI Visibility: 8% Share of Model
The Challenge
The company had inconsistent brand information across the web. AI systems couldn't reliably identify them as a distinct entity, leading to confusion and missed citations.
Initial Assessment:
- Share of Model: 8%
- Brand name spelled 3 different ways across directories
- Company description inconsistent across platforms
- No Wikipedia presence
- Schema markup: None
The Strategy
Phase 1: Entity Audit & Cleanup (Month 1)
- Identified all brand mentions across web
- Standardized brand name everywhere (fixed 47 inconsistencies)
- Created consistent company description (used across all platforms)
- Updated all directory listings
Phase 2: Entity Definition (Month 1-2)
- Implemented comprehensive Organization schema
- Created Wikidata entry
- Submitted to all major business databases
- Updated Crunchbase, LinkedIn, G2 with consistent information
Phase 3: Entity Reinforcement (Month 2-4)
- Published "About [Company]" press release
- Secured media coverage mentioning official brand description
- Had employees update LinkedIn titles consistently
- Created Knowledge Panel-optimized About page
Phase 4: Wikipedia Effort (Month 4-6)
- Met notability requirements through press coverage
- Created Wikipedia article (neutral tone, well-sourced)
- Monitored and maintained article quality
The Results
| Metric | Before | After (6 Months) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share of Model | 8% | 23% | +188% |
| ChatGPT brand recognition | 12% | 34% | +183% |
| Claude mentions | 6% | 22% | +267% |
| Google Knowledge Panel | No | Yes | New |
| "Is [Company] good for [X]" queries | 3% | 41% | +1,267% |
Key Lessons
Case Study 5: Data Analytics Firm's Benchmark Strategy
Company Profile
- Industry: Data Analytics / BI
- Company Size: 150 employees, $25M ARR
- Market Position: Specialist in healthcare analytics
- Starting AI Visibility: 5% Share of Model
The Challenge
As a specialist in a specific vertical (healthcare), they struggled to get mentioned alongside generalist players like Tableau and Looker in AI responses.
Initial Assessment:
- Share of Model: 5% overall
- Healthcare-specific queries: 12%
- General "data analytics" queries: 2%
- Competitor (Tableau): 29% SoM
The Strategy
Phase 1: Niche Dominance (Month 1-3)
- Decided to dominate healthcare analytics AI visibility before expanding
- Created "Healthcare Data Analytics" definitive guide (8,000 words)
- Published "Healthcare Analytics Benchmark Report" with industry-specific data
- Developed case studies from 10 healthcare clients
Phase 2: Industry-Specific Content (Month 2-4)
- Created content for every healthcare analytics use case
- Built comparison pages: "[Company] vs Tableau for Healthcare"
- Developed "Healthcare Analytics ROI Calculator" with original data
- Published compliance-specific guides (HIPAA analytics, etc.)
Phase 3: Vertical Authority (Month 3-6)
- Joined healthcare industry associations
- Spoke at 5 healthcare conferences
- Got quoted in Healthcare IT News, Modern Healthcare
- Published in peer-reviewed healthcare informatics journal
The Results
| Metric | Before | After (6 Months) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share of Model (overall) | 5% | 14% | +180% |
| Share of Model (healthcare) | 12% | 47% | +292% |
| "Healthcare analytics" queries | 12% | 52% | +333% |
| "Tableau alternative healthcare" | 0% | 78% | New |
| Healthcare vertical pipeline | $2M | $6.2M | +210% |
Key Lessons
Common Success Patterns
What All Five Companies Did
| Strategy | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original research/data | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Schema markup | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Answer-first content | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Entity optimization | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Third-party validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Author credentials | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Timeline to Results
| Milestone | Typical Timeline |
|---|---|
| First Perplexity citations | 2-4 weeks |
| Measurable SoM improvement | 6-8 weeks |
| Significant gains (50%+ increase) | 3-4 months |
| Category-leading position | 6-12 months |
Investment Requirements
| Company Size | Typical Monthly Investment |
|---|---|
| Startup (<$10M ARR) | $5,000-15,000 |
| Mid-market ($10-50M ARR) | $15,000-40,000 |
| Enterprise ($50M+ ARR) | $40,000-100,000+ |
*Includes content creation, PR, tools, and internal team time*
Your Turn: Getting Started
Quick Assessment
Ask yourself:
First Steps
Key Takeaways
- 300%+ citation growth is achievable with systematic effort
- Original research is the highest-impact tactic (appeared in 4/5 cases)
- Technical foundation (schema) is prerequisite (all 5 companies)
- Third-party validation accelerates results (all 5 companies)
- Niche dominance beats broad mediocrity (Case 5)
- Timeline to significant results: 3-6 months
Ready to Write Your Own Case Study?
Start by measuring where you are today.
Get Your Free AI Visibility Score →
Track your Share of Model, benchmark against competitors, and identify your biggest opportunities.
Start Measuring Your AI Search Visibility
You can't improve what you don't measure. See how your brand appears in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and more.
Check Your AI Visibility Free →