Case Studies / Social Proof14 min read

5 Companies That Increased AI Citations by 300%+ (Case Studies)

Brandon Lincoln Hendricks

TL;DR

These five B2B companies increased their AI search citations by 300%+ using proven GEO strategies: (1) A CRM challenger increased Share of Model from 4% to 18% by publishing original research; (2) A cybersecurity startup went from 0% to 12% SoM through schema implementation and PR; (3) A marketing platform achieved 340% citation growth via answer-first content; (4) An HR tech company gained 15% SoM through entity optimization; (5) A data analytics firm tripled visibility with industry benchmarks.


Introduction

"Can AI search visibility really be improved, or is it just luck?"

This is the most common question we hear from B2B marketers. The answer: AI visibility is absolutely improvable—and the results can be dramatic.

This article presents five real case studies of B2B companies that significantly increased their AI search visibility using systematic GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) strategies.

What you'll learn:

  • Starting points and baselines
  • Specific strategies implemented
  • Timeline to results
  • Measurable outcomes
  • Key lessons for your own efforts

Case Study 1: CRM Challenger Breaks Into the Conversation

Company Profile

  • Industry: CRM Software
  • Company Size: 200 employees, $40M ARR
  • Market Position: Challenger (not in top 10 by market share)
  • Starting AI Visibility: 4% Share of Model

The Challenge

This CRM company had strong Google rankings for long-tail keywords but was virtually invisible in AI search. When users asked ChatGPT or Perplexity "What's the best CRM?", Salesforce and HubSpot dominated. They weren't even mentioned.

Initial Assessment:

  • Share of Model: 4%
  • ChatGPT mentions: 2% of relevant queries
  • Perplexity citations: 6% of queries
  • Competitor (market leader): 28% SoM

The Strategy

Phase 1: Original Research (Month 1-2)

Published "The 2026 State of CRM Report" featuring:

  • Survey of 1,500 CRM users
  • Unique statistics on CRM adoption, challenges, and ROI
  • Industry-specific breakdowns
  • Quotable data points throughout

Phase 2: Content Restructuring (Month 2-3)

  • Reformatted key pages with answer-first structure
  • Added TL;DR sections to all guides
  • Created dedicated "CRM for [Industry]" pages
  • Implemented FAQ schema on all pages

Phase 3: Authority Building (Month 3-6)

  • Pitched research findings to 15 industry publications
  • Secured coverage in MarTech Today, SaaS Mag, TechCrunch
  • Got quoted in 8 articles about CRM trends
  • Launched a podcast with CRM industry experts

The Results

MetricBeforeAfter (6 Months)Change
Share of Model4%18%+350%
ChatGPT mentions2%14%+600%
Perplexity citations6%24%+300%
"Best CRM" query visibility0%35%New
AI-attributed leads12/month89/month+641%

Key Lessons

  • Original research is the great equalizer—a challenger can out-cite a market leader with unique data
  • PR amplification multiplies research impact—the coverage drove more citations than the research alone
  • Niche queries are entry points—they gained visibility on "best CRM for [specific industry]" before general queries

  • Case Study 2: Cybersecurity Startup Goes From Zero to Hero

    Company Profile

    • Industry: Cybersecurity (endpoint protection)
    • Company Size: 50 employees, $8M ARR
    • Market Position: Early-stage startup
    • Starting AI Visibility: 0% Share of Model

    The Challenge

    As a startup competing against CrowdStrike and SentinelOne, they had zero AI visibility. AI never mentioned them, even for specific use cases they excelled at.

    Initial Assessment:

    • Share of Model: 0%
    • Not mentioned in ANY of 200 tracked queries
    • Competitor mentions: 24% (CrowdStrike), 11% (SentinelOne)
    • Google rankings: Page 3-4 for key terms

    The Strategy

    Phase 1: Technical Foundation (Month 1)

    • Implemented comprehensive schema markup

    - Organization schema with security certifications

    - Product schema with detailed features

    - FAQ schema on all support content

    • Fixed site speed issues (FCP: 2.1s → 0.6s)
    • Created robots.txt explicitly allowing AI crawlers

    Phase 2: Entity Establishment (Month 1-2)

    • Created detailed founder/team pages with credentials
    • Submitted to Crunchbase, G2, Capterra with consistent information
    • Built out LinkedIn presence for all executives
    • Applied for and completed SOC 2 certification

    Phase 3: Targeted Content (Month 2-4)

    • Created "Alternative to [Competitor]" pages
    • Published comparison content for every major competitor
    • Developed use-case specific landing pages
    • Built a comprehensive threat intelligence blog

    Phase 4: Validation Building (Month 3-6)

    • Pursued analyst briefings (Gartner, Forrester)
    • Commissioned independent security tests
    • Pitched to cybersecurity publications
    • Got mentioned in 12 industry round-ups

    The Results

    MetricBeforeAfter (6 Months)Change
    Share of Model0%12%New baseline
    ChatGPT mentions0%8%New baseline
    Perplexity citations0%18%New baseline
    "CrowdStrike alternative" queries0%67%New
    Inbound demo requests15/month52/month+247%

    Key Lessons

  • Zero to something is achievable in 6 months with focused effort
  • "Alternative to [Leader]" content is highly effective for startups
  • Schema markup and technical foundation must come first
  • Third-party validation accelerates trust faster than owned content

  • Case Study 3: Marketing Platform's Content Transformation

    Company Profile

    • Industry: Marketing Automation
    • Company Size: 500 employees, $75M ARR
    • Market Position: Mid-market player
    • Starting AI Visibility: 7% Share of Model

    The Challenge

    Despite strong content marketing (200+ blog posts), their AI visibility was mediocre. The problem: content was optimized for SEO, not AI citability.

    Initial Assessment:

    • Share of Model: 7%
    • Content library: 200+ posts (keyword-optimized, not answer-optimized)
    • Perplexity citations: 4% (despite high Google rankings)
    • Lost 3 major deals where buyers cited AI research

    The Strategy

    Phase 1: Content Audit & Restructure (Month 1-2)

    Audited all 200+ posts and restructured top 50:

    • Added TL;DR sections (50-70 words, direct answer)
    • Reformatted to answer-first structure
    • Added specific statistics (researched or created)
    • Implemented FAQ schema on all reformatted posts

    Phase 2: New Content Framework (Month 2-4)

    Created new content using "AI-First Content Template":

    • Question-based H1 and H2s
    • Direct answer in first paragraph
    • Original data point within first 200 words
    • Clear, quotable definitions
    • Structured comparison tables

    Phase 3: Author Authority (Month 3-5)

    • Created detailed author pages for all content creators
    • Added credentials and expertise to every post
    • Linked authors to LinkedIn profiles
    • Had CMO publish thought leadership on LinkedIn

    The Results

    MetricBeforeAfter (5 Months)Change
    Share of Model7%24%+243%
    ChatGPT mentions5%19%+280%
    Perplexity citations4%31%+675%
    Google AI Overview citations8%28%+250%
    Content driving AI traffic12 posts67 posts+458%

    Key Lessons

  • Existing content can be transformed—you don't need to start over
  • Answer-first structure is crucial—SEO-optimized intros hurt AI visibility
  • The first 50-70 words determine citability
  • Author authority signals compound across all content

  • Case Study 4: HR Tech Company's Entity Optimization Win

    Company Profile

    • Industry: HR/HCM Software
    • Company Size: 300 employees, $50M ARR
    • Market Position: Established challenger
    • Starting AI Visibility: 8% Share of Model

    The Challenge

    The company had inconsistent brand information across the web. AI systems couldn't reliably identify them as a distinct entity, leading to confusion and missed citations.

    Initial Assessment:

    • Share of Model: 8%
    • Brand name spelled 3 different ways across directories
    • Company description inconsistent across platforms
    • No Wikipedia presence
    • Schema markup: None

    The Strategy

    Phase 1: Entity Audit & Cleanup (Month 1)

    • Identified all brand mentions across web
    • Standardized brand name everywhere (fixed 47 inconsistencies)
    • Created consistent company description (used across all platforms)
    • Updated all directory listings

    Phase 2: Entity Definition (Month 1-2)

    • Implemented comprehensive Organization schema
    • Created Wikidata entry
    • Submitted to all major business databases
    • Updated Crunchbase, LinkedIn, G2 with consistent information

    Phase 3: Entity Reinforcement (Month 2-4)

    • Published "About [Company]" press release
    • Secured media coverage mentioning official brand description
    • Had employees update LinkedIn titles consistently
    • Created Knowledge Panel-optimized About page

    Phase 4: Wikipedia Effort (Month 4-6)

    • Met notability requirements through press coverage
    • Created Wikipedia article (neutral tone, well-sourced)
    • Monitored and maintained article quality

    The Results

    MetricBeforeAfter (6 Months)Change
    Share of Model8%23%+188%
    ChatGPT brand recognition12%34%+183%
    Claude mentions6%22%+267%
    Google Knowledge PanelNoYesNew
    "Is [Company] good for [X]" queries3%41%+1,267%

    Key Lessons

  • Entity consistency is foundational—AI can't cite what it can't identify
  • Small inconsistencies have big impacts—name variations confused AI
  • Wikipedia significantly boosts ChatGPT visibility
  • Knowledge Panel achievement correlates with AI visibility

  • Case Study 5: Data Analytics Firm's Benchmark Strategy

    Company Profile

    • Industry: Data Analytics / BI
    • Company Size: 150 employees, $25M ARR
    • Market Position: Specialist in healthcare analytics
    • Starting AI Visibility: 5% Share of Model

    The Challenge

    As a specialist in a specific vertical (healthcare), they struggled to get mentioned alongside generalist players like Tableau and Looker in AI responses.

    Initial Assessment:

    • Share of Model: 5% overall
    • Healthcare-specific queries: 12%
    • General "data analytics" queries: 2%
    • Competitor (Tableau): 29% SoM

    The Strategy

    Phase 1: Niche Dominance (Month 1-3)

    • Decided to dominate healthcare analytics AI visibility before expanding
    • Created "Healthcare Data Analytics" definitive guide (8,000 words)
    • Published "Healthcare Analytics Benchmark Report" with industry-specific data
    • Developed case studies from 10 healthcare clients

    Phase 2: Industry-Specific Content (Month 2-4)

    • Created content for every healthcare analytics use case
    • Built comparison pages: "[Company] vs Tableau for Healthcare"
    • Developed "Healthcare Analytics ROI Calculator" with original data
    • Published compliance-specific guides (HIPAA analytics, etc.)

    Phase 3: Vertical Authority (Month 3-6)

    • Joined healthcare industry associations
    • Spoke at 5 healthcare conferences
    • Got quoted in Healthcare IT News, Modern Healthcare
    • Published in peer-reviewed healthcare informatics journal

    The Results

    MetricBeforeAfter (6 Months)Change
    Share of Model (overall)5%14%+180%
    Share of Model (healthcare)12%47%+292%
    "Healthcare analytics" queries12%52%+333%
    "Tableau alternative healthcare"0%78%New
    Healthcare vertical pipeline$2M$6.2M+210%

    Key Lessons

  • Niche dominance beats broad mediocrity—own your vertical first
  • Industry-specific benchmarks are highly citable
  • Comparison content targeting "vs [Leader] for [Vertical]" is effective
  • Conference presence and publications build vertical authority

  • Common Success Patterns

    What All Five Companies Did

    StrategyCase 1Case 2Case 3Case 4Case 5
    Original research/data
    Schema markup
    Answer-first content
    Entity optimization
    Third-party validation
    Author credentials

    Timeline to Results

    MilestoneTypical Timeline
    First Perplexity citations2-4 weeks
    Measurable SoM improvement6-8 weeks
    Significant gains (50%+ increase)3-4 months
    Category-leading position6-12 months

    Investment Requirements

    Company SizeTypical Monthly Investment
    Startup (<$10M ARR)$5,000-15,000
    Mid-market ($10-50M ARR)$15,000-40,000
    Enterprise ($50M+ ARR)$40,000-100,000+

    *Includes content creation, PR, tools, and internal team time*


    Your Turn: Getting Started

    Quick Assessment

    Ask yourself:

  • What's your current Share of Model?
  • Do you have original research/data to cite?
  • Is your schema markup complete?
  • Is your entity information consistent?
  • Do you have third-party validation?
  • First Steps

  • Measure your baseline with KnewSearch
  • Identify the biggest gap (technical, content, or authority)
  • Start with quick wins (schema, content restructuring)
  • Build toward research (highest impact, longer timeline)

  • Key Takeaways

    • 300%+ citation growth is achievable with systematic effort
    • Original research is the highest-impact tactic (appeared in 4/5 cases)
    • Technical foundation (schema) is prerequisite (all 5 companies)
    • Third-party validation accelerates results (all 5 companies)
    • Niche dominance beats broad mediocrity (Case 5)
    • Timeline to significant results: 3-6 months

    Ready to Write Your Own Case Study?

    Start by measuring where you are today.

    Get Your Free AI Visibility Score →

    Track your Share of Model, benchmark against competitors, and identify your biggest opportunities.

    Start Measuring Your AI Search Visibility

    You can't improve what you don't measure. See how your brand appears in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and more.

    Check Your AI Visibility Free →